Clinical Presentation, Management, and Diagnostic Performance of 2021 Criteria for Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes in Childhood.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) are remote neurologic immune-related effects of tumors. The clinical characteristics of pediatric PNSs remain unclear. We retrospectively examined the clinical characteristics of cases of pediatric PNSs and assessed the performance of the 2021 diagnostic criteria in children. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in the Beijing Children's Hospital between June 2015 and June 2023 and fulfilling the description of definite by 2004 diagnostic criteria of PNSs were included. A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics was conducted, and the 2021 diagnostic criteria were applied to rediagnostic stratification. RESULTS: Among the 42 patients included, the most common neurologic syndrome was opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome (OMS) (62%), followed by rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome (26%). Most tumors were neuroblastomas (88%), with few being ovarian teratomas (10%). Approximately 71% (30/42) of patients were classified as definite and 24% (10/42) as probable according to the 2021 criteria. All cases judged as probable exhibited rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia with neuroblastoma. For OMS, chemotherapy was administered based on the tumor's risk stage, accompanied by regular infusion of IV gamma globulin and oral steroids following tumor diagnosis. Twenty-one patients underwent regular follow-ups over 4.92 (0.58-7.58) years. The initial hospitalization recorded a median score of 12 (7-14) on the Mitchell and Pike OMS rating scale, decreasing to 0 (0-5) at the final follow-up. In cases of rapidly progressive cerebellar syndrome, a similar therapeutic regimen was used. Nine patients underwent regular follow-ups over 4.42 (1.17-7.50) years. The mean modified Rankin scale score at first hospitalization was 4 (3-4), reducing to 1 (0-4) at the final follow-up. Only 17% (5/30) of patients across both groups exhibited poor response to this regimen. Among these 5 patients, 4 belonged to the low-risk group (without chemotherapy). DISCUSSION: OMS followed by rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia are the most common forms of PNSs in children and are associated with neuroblastoma. An aggressive approach with multiple immunotherapies may improve the prognosis of neuroblastoma-associated PNSs. The 2021 criteria perform well in pediatric PNSs. However, we propose upgrading the classification of antibody-negative rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia with neuroblastoma to definite diagnosis. This adjustment aims to further improve the diagnostic efficacy of this diagnostic criterion in childhood.

Paraneoplastic autonomic neuropathies and GI dysmotility.

A number of the well-recognized autoimmune and paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes commonly involve the autonomic nervous system. In some cases, the autonomic nerves or ganglia are primary targets of neurologic autoimmunity, as in immune-mediated autonomic ganglionopathies. In other disorders such as encephalitis, autonomic centers in the brain may be affected. The presence of autonomic dysfunction (especially gastrointestinal dysmotility) is sometimes overlooked even though this may contribute significantly to the symptom burden in these paraneoplastic disorders. Additionally, recognition of autonomic features as part of the clinical syndrome can help point the diagnostic evaluation toward autoimmune and paraneoplastic etiologies. As with other paraneoplastic disorders, the clinical syndrome and the presence and type of neurologic autoantibodies help to secure the diagnosis and direct the most appropriate investigation for malignancy. Optimal management for these conditions typically includes aggressive treatment of the neoplasm, immunomodulatory therapy, and symptomatic treatments for orthostatic hypotension and gastrointestinal dysmotility.

Paraneoplastic antibodies targeting intracellular antigens.

Although they are relatively rare, the diagnosis of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) can be aided by the identification of neural autoantibodies in patients' serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). They often clinically manifest as characteristic syndromes, including limbic encephalitis, opsoclonus-myoclonus syndrome, paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, and paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis. The antibodies are directed either toward intracellular targets, or epitopes on the cell surface. As compared to cell surface antibodies, intracellular paraneoplastic autoantibodies are more classically associated with cancer, most often lung, breast, thymoma, gynecologic, testicular, and/or neuroendocrine cancers. The malignancies themselves tend to be small and regionally contained, attesting to the strength of the immune system in cancer immunosurveillance. Typically, the intracellular antibodies are not directly pathogenic and tend to be associated with PNS that are poorly responsive to treatment. With some notable exceptions, including patients with PNS associated with testicular cancer, patients with intracellular antibodies are typically older individuals, in their 7th decade of life and beyond. Many of them are current or former smokers. Treatment strategies include tumor removal as well as immunotherapy to treat the concomitant PNS. Newer technologies and the ever-broadening use of cancer immunotherapies are contributing to the continued identification of novel intracellularly targeted autoantibodies.

Management of Paraneoplastic Syndromes in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

OPINION STATEMENT: Our understanding of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) has blossomed over the past few decades. Clinicians have access to more robust diagnostic criteria and have a heightened index of suspicion for these disorders. Nonetheless, treatment, which typically includes immunosuppression, and response to treatment, varies. Due to persistent difficulty in making a definitive diagnosis, we favor empiric treatment when a possible diagnosis of PNS is suspected, and other alternative causes have substantially been excluded (e.g., infections, toxic-metabolic derangements, metastasis, or leptomeningeal disease). Treatment of the underlying cancer, if identified, is the first therapeutic step and can prevent disease worsening and in rare cases, can reverse neurologic symptoms. In addition to anti-cancer treatment, first line immunotherapies, which include corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), or plasma exchange (PLEX) are typically used. If partial or no benefit is seen, second line immunotherapeutic agents such as rituximab are considered. Additionally, the severity of the initial presentation and possible risk for relapse influences the use of the latter agents. Symptomatic management is also an important component in our practice and will depend on the syndrome being treated. One of the more novel entities we are facing currently is the management of immune checkpoint (ICI)-induced PNS. In those cases, current American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines are followed.

Updates in the Management of Paraneoplastic Syndrome.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are defined as remote neurologic immune-mediated effects triggered by underlying systemic tumors. While recognizing specific syndromes can aid early cancer detection, overutilization of paraneoplastic assays in the absence of a classic syndrome can precipitate overdiagnosis and overtreatment. PNS involve autoantibodies targeting intracellular or extracellular antigens, with variable immunotherapy responses based on antigen type. Diagnosing PNS is challenging, requiring exclusion of other differential diagnoses. New diagnostic criteria classify PNS into high-risk and intermediate-risk phenotypes based on clinical phenotype, neuronal antibodies, and cancer presence. Patients with cell surface antibodies respond better to immunotherapies compared to those with intracellular antigen targets. Understanding PNS syndromes, serological markers, and oncological features guides management, which facilitates initiation of immunosuppression for PNS alongside treatment of the underlying neoplasm, thereby improving neurologic and oncologic outcomes. Initial treatments often include intravenous methylprednisolone, plasma exchange, or intravenous immunoglobulins. Second-line immunosuppressants like rituximab or cyclophosphamide may be necessary if initial treatments fail. Specific therapies vary based on antibody target. Here, we summarize the current approach to the investigation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with suspected PNS.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, a class of oncological treatments that enhance antitumour immunity, can trigger neurological adverse events closely resembling paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Unlike other neurological adverse events caused by these drugs, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes predominantly affect the CNS and are associated with neural antibodies and cancer types commonly found also in spontaneous paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Furthermore, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes have poorer neurological outcomes than other neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are likely to be crucial in preventing the accumulation of neurological disability. Importantly, the neural antibodies found in patients with post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are sometimes detected before treatment, indicating that these antibodies might help to predict the development of neurological adverse events. Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes probably share immunological features with spontaneous paraneoplastic syndromes. Hence, the study of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help in deciphering the immunopathogenesis of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and in identifying novel therapeutic targets.

Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: Progress is ongoing in understanding paraneoplastic neurologic disorders, with new syndromes and antibodies being described and more detailed evidence available to guide workup for diagnosis and treatment to improve outcomes. Many excellent reviews have summarized the molecular features of different antibodies, but this article emphasizes the clinical features of each syndrome that may help guide initial diagnosis and treatment, which often should occur before an antibody or cancer is found to confirm the diagnosis. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: Recent findings include updated diagnostic criteria with validated sensitivity and specificity, discovery of novel antibodies, and clinical findings that increase the likelihood of an underlying paraneoplastic disorder. Suggestive syndromes that have been recently identified include faciobrachial dystonic seizures and pilomotor auras in anti-leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1 encephalitis, extreme delta brush on EEG in N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor encephalitis, déjà vu aura in anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) encephalitis, and sleep disturbances in several disorders. In addition, there is confirmed utility of brain positron emission tomography (PET) and CSF markers, including carcinoembryonic antigen and oligoclonal bands, as well as improved tests for the presence of leptomeningeal cancer cells in CSF. Associations of cancer immunotherapies with paraneoplastic syndromes and herpes simplex virus encephalitis (and COVID-19) with NMDA-receptor encephalitis have been described. ESSENTIAL POINTS: All neurologists should be aware of advances regarding paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes, as patients can present with a wide variety of neurologic symptoms and earlier diagnosis and treatment can improve outcomes.

Autoimmune and paraneoplastic neurological disorders: A review of relevant neuroimaging findings.

INTRODUCTION: Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) and autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) are immune-mediated disorders. PNS is linked to cancer, while AIE may not Their clinical manifestations and imaging patterns need further elucidation. OBJECTIVE/AIMS: To investigate the clinical profiles, antibody associations, neuroimaging patterns, treatments, and outcomes of PNS and AIE. METHODS: A systematic review of 379 articles published between 2014 and 2023 was conducted. Of the 55 studies screened, 333 patients were diagnosed with either PNS or AIE and tested positive for novel antibodies. Data on demographics, symptoms, imaging, antibodies, cancer associations, treatment, and outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: The study included 333 patients (mean age 54 years, 67% males) with PNS and AIE positive for various novel antibodies. 84% had central nervous system issues like cognitive impairment (53%), rhombencephalitis (17%), and cerebellar disorders (24%). Neuroimaging revealed distinct patterns with high-risk antibodies associated with brainstem lesions in 98%, cerebellar in 91%, hippocampal in 98%, basal ganglia in 75%, and spinal cord in 91%, while low/intermediate-risk antibodies were associated with medial temporal lobe lesions in 71% and other cortical/subcortical lesions in 55%. High-risk antibodies were associated with younger males, deep brain lesions, and increased mortality of 61%, while low/intermediate-risk antibodies were associated with females, cortical/subcortical lesions, and better outcomes with 39% mortality. Associated cancers included seminomas (23%), lung (19%), ovarian (2%), and breast (2%). Treatments included IVIG, chemotherapy, and plasmapheresis. Overall mortality was 25% in this cohort. CONCLUSION: PNS and AIE have distinct clinical and radiological patterns based on antibody profiles. High-risk antibodies are associated with increased mortality while low/intermediate-risk antibodies are associated with improved outcomes. Appropriate imaging and antibody testing are critical for accurate diagnosis.

[Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes].

Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) are a group of neurological disorders that are possibly caused by immunological mechanisms triggered by an underlying tumor that involves every part of the nervous system. Autoantibodies were categorized according to the risk of cancer association. Antibodies against intracellular proteins are excellent markers for tumor detection, however, without functional roles in neuronal loss, the direct effector of neuronal damage is thought to be cytotoxic T cells. The frequently associated symptoms include limbic encephalitis, cerebellar ataxia and sensory neuronopathy. The associated tumors are mainly small-cell lung cancer, breast/ovarian/uterine cancers, and thymoma. Timely diagnosis, prompt immunotherapy, and treatment of the underlying tumor are essential for managing PNS. However, we need to be cautious about the high frequency of false-positive/negative results of antibodies using commercial antibody tests. This highlight the importance of the careful evaluation of clinical features. Recently, PNS emerged after immune check point inhibitor administration, and this became a subject of attention exploring its pathogenesis. Other basic studies to understand the immunological background of PNS have been progressing.

S2k guidelines on the management of paraneoplastic pemphigus/paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV).

BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic pemphigus (PNP), also called paraneoplastic autoimmune multiorgan syndrome (PAMS), is a rare autoimmune disease with mucocutaneous and multi-organ involvement. PNP/PAMS is typically associated with lymphoproliferative or haematological malignancies, and less frequently with solid malignancies. The mortality rate of PNP/PAMS is elevated owing to the increased risk of severe infections and disease-associated complications, such as bronchiolitis obliterans. OBJECTIVES: These guidelines summarize evidence-based and expert-based recommendations (S2k level) for the clinical characterization, diagnosis and management of PNP/PAMS. They have been initiated by the Task Force Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology with the contribution of physicians from all relevant disciplines. The degree of consent among all task force members was included. RESULTS: Chronic severe mucositis and polymorphic skin lesions are clue clinical characteristics of PNP/PAMS. A complete assessment of the patient with suspected PNP/PAMS, requiring histopathological study and immunopathological investigations, including direct and indirect immunofluorescence, ELISA and, where available, immunoblotting/immunoprecipitation, is recommended to achieve a diagnosis of PNP/PAMS. Detection of anti-envoplakin antibodies and/or circulating antibodies binding to the rat bladder epithelium at indirect immunofluorescence is the most specific tool for the diagnosis of PNP/PAMS in a patient with compatible clinical and anamnestic features. Treatment of PNP/PAMS is highly challenging. Systemic steroids up to 1.5 mg/kg/day are recommended as first-line option. Rituximab is also recommended in patients with PNP/PAMS secondary to lymphoproliferative conditions but might also be considered in cases of PNP/PAMS associated with solid tumours. A multidisciplinary approach involving pneumologists, ophthalmologists and onco-haematologists is recommended for optimal management of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first European guidelines for the diagnosis and management of PNP/PAMS. Diagnostic criteria and therapeutic recommendations will require further validation by prospective studies.

Paraneoplastic Neurologic Disorders.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview and highlight recent updates in the field of paraneoplastic neurologic disorders. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of paraneoplastic neurologic disorders is greater than previously reported and the incidence has been rising over time, due to improved recognition in the era of antibody biomarkers. Updated diagnostic criteria that are broadly inclusive and also contain diagnostic risk for clinical presentations (high and intermediate) and diagnostic antibodies (high, intermediate, and low) have replaced the original 2004 criteria. Antibody biomarkers continue to be characterized (e.g., KLHL-11 associated with seminoma in men with brainstem encephalitis). Some paraneoplastic antibodies also provide insight into likely immunotherapy response and prognosis. The rise of immune checkpoint inhibitors as cancer therapeutics has been associated with newly observed immune-mediated adverse effects including paraneoplastic neurological disorders. The therapeutic approach to paraneoplastic neurologic disorders is centered around cancer care and trials of immune therapy. The field of paraneoplastic neurologic disorders continues to be advanced by the identification of novel antibody biomarkers which have diagnostic utility, and give insight into likely treatment responses and outcomes.

Kelch-like protein 11 antibody-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndrome: A state-of-the-art review.

The Kelch-like protein 11 antibody-associated paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (KLHL 11-PNS) was first identified in 2019. This novel antibody, targeting the intracellular KLHL 11 antigen, can be detected in serum and cerebrospinal fluid using tissue-based and cell-based assays. It is thought to be a biomarker for a T-cell autoimmunity response. The most likely immunopathogenesis of KLHL 11-PNS appears to be linked to cytotoxic T-cell-mediated neuronal injury and loss. Patients have adult-male predilection, rhombencephalitis (brainstem and / or cerebellar involvement), and a robust oncological correlation with testicular germ cell tumors (predominately seminoma). Brain magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated T2 / fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensities and atrophy of the temporal lobe, cerebellum, and brainstem. Most patients responded poorly to immunotherapy and oncotherapy and thus had a poor long-term prognosis. We review the literature and provide an update of current knowledge regarding KLHL 11-PNS, including epidemiology, underlying mechanism, clinical presentations, paraclinical and oncological findings, diagnostic workup, and treatment approaches.

Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes: Transitioning Between the Old and the New.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are caused by nervous system-targeting aberrant anti-tumoral immune responses. We review the updated criteria for PNS diagnosis, incorporating novel information on clinical phenotypes, neuronal autoantibodies (Nabs), and tumors. The impact of the oncologic use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on PNS occurrence is also addressed. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical phenotypes and Nabs are redefined as "high/intermediate/low" risk, following the frequency of cancer association. Nabs, the diagnostic hallmark of PNS, can target intracellular or surface neuronal proteins, with important prognostic and pathogenic implications. Many novel assays have been incorporated into laboratory diagnostics, that is becoming increasingly complex. ICI fight tumors, but favor autoimmunity, thus increasing the incidence of PNS-like disorders. Overcoming the old PNS criteria, the new ones are centered around the presence of tumor. Clinical presentation, Nabs, and tumor findings are translated in diagnostic scores, providing a useful tool for PNS diagnosis and management.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes in patients affected by SCLC: a case series.

Paraneoplastic syndromes occur in about 0.1% of patients affected by neoplastic diseases. In some types of tumors, such as Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC), Thymoma, and particular forms of Plasmacytoma, the association with Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes (PNS) is much more frequent. It seems that these syndromes are triggered by tumor production of factors normally expressed only by the individual's nervous system. The immune system stimulates an autoimmune response against these factors that induce neurological symptoms. Also, in light of the latest updates on the relationship between immunotherapy and PNS as well as of the introduction of first-line immunotherapy in SCLC, it seems that the use of immunotherapy in SCLC is associated with concomitant increase in autoimmune neurological syndromes.In this article, we report our experience at Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan with three patients affected by SCLC and PNS. Our experience seems to confirm that the oncological treatment scarcely impacts the paraneoplastic neurological deficits. Further research is needed to improve the treatment and recovery of patients affected by PNS.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes: a practical approach to diagnosis and management.

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are the immune-mediated effects of a remote cancer and are characterised by an autoantibody response against antigens expressed by the tumour. Classically, well-characterised 'onconeuronal' antibodies target intracellular antigens and hence cannot access their antigens across intact cell membranes. The pathogenic mediators are likely to be neuronal-specific T cells. There is a variable response to immunotherapies and the clinical syndrome helps to direct the search for a specific set of tumours. By contrast, many newly emerging autoantibodies with oncological associations target cell surface epitopes and can exert direct pathogenic effects on both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Patients with these cell-surface directed autoantibodies often clearly respond to immunotherapies. Overall, the clinical, serological and oncological features in an individual patient help to determine the clinical relevance of the syndrome and hence guide its management. We summarise current knowledge and a practical approach to the investigation, diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of patients with suspected PNS.

Paraneoplastic sensorimotor neuropathy and ventral cauda equina nerve root enhancement as initial presentation of small cell lung carcinoma: a case study.

BACKGROUND: Paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS) are rare, however, are important to recognize as oftentimes they precede the detection of an occult malignancy. Our case highlights a rare circumstance of paraneoplastic radiculoneuropathy and the importance of recognizing PNS in antibody negative disease, as is the case in up to 16% of sensory neuronopathies, and the process of excluding other etiologies. CASE PRESENTATION: We discuss a 51-year-old man who presented with asymmetric subacute sensorimotor deficits in the lower limbs. Initial clinical examination showed weakness throughout the right lower limb and normal strength on the left with objective numbness in a mixed dermatomal and stocking-glove distribution. Electrophysiology was consistent with axonal sensorimotor neuropathy. Cerebrospinal fluid showed pleocytosis and elevated protein. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment was given with some improvement in pain symptoms but no measurable motor improvement. Following clinical and electrophysiologic deterioration the patient was transferred to a tertiary centre. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine showed smooth enhancement of the ventral caudal nerve roots. Chest computed tomography revealed left lower vascular scarring. Further positron emission tomography scan imaging identified fluorodeoxyglucose avid right lung lymphadenopathy. Bronchoscopy-guided biopsy revealed small cell lung carcinoma. Onconeural and antiganglioside antibodies were negative. The patient was then transferred to a medical oncology ward where he underwent chemoradiotherapy and subsequently experienced improvement in his motor function, supporting that his neurological condition was indeed secondary to a paraneoplastic process. CONCLUSIONS: Onconeural negative paraneoplastic radiculoneuropathy can precede diagnosis of small cell lung carcinoma. If considered early and adequately investigated, it can allow earlier diagnosis and treatment of underlying malignancy, improving overall and neurological prognosis.

[Paraneoplastic Disorders of the Central Nervous System].

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are neurological disorders that occur as indirect immune-mediated responses to malignancies. The increased number of patients with PNS correlates with the discovery of an increasing number of novel autoantibodies associated with PNS. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors that have expanded the range of cancers strongly associated with PNS has likely increased the frequency of PNS diagnoses. This article presents an overview of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of PNS.

Pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

Introduction: Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) are a rare heterogeneous group of neurological diseases associated with tumors. These syndromes are the result of a cross-reactive immune response against antigens shared by the tumor and the nervous system. The discovery of an increasing number of autoantigens and the identification of tumoral factors leading to a substantial antitumoral immune response makes this topic highly innovative.Areas covered: This review covers the clinical, oncological, pathophysiological aspects of both immunological PNS groups. One is associated with autoantibodies against intracellular onconeural antibodies, which are highly specific for an underlying tumor, although the disease is mainly T-cell mediated. In contrast, PNS associated with pathogenic surface-binding/receptor autoantibodies, which are often responsive to immunosuppressive treatment, may manifest as paraneoplastic and non-paraneoplastic diseases. The most frequent tumors associated with PNS are (small cell) lung cancer, gynecological tumors, thymoma, lymphoma, and, in children, neuroblastoma. A special interest is given to PNS, induced by immune checkpoint-inhibitors (ICIs).Expert opinion: Research in PNS, including the group of ICI-induced PNS provide new insights in both the pathophysiology of PNS and tumor immune interactions and offers new treatment options for this group of severe neurological diseases.

Leucine Zipper 4 Autoantibody: A Novel Germ Cell Tumor and Paraneoplastic Biomarker.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe a novel biomarker of germ cell tumor and associated paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS). METHODS: Archival sera from patients with germ cell tumor-associated PNS were evaluated. We identified a common autoantigen in a human testicular cancer cell line (TCam-2) by Western blot and mass spectrometry. Its identity was confirmed by recombinant-protein Western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and cell-based assay. Autoantibody specificity was confirmed by analyzing assorted control sera/cerebrospinal fluid. RESULTS: Leucine zipper 4 (LUZP4)-immunoglobulin G (IgG) was detected in 28 patients' sera, 26 of whom (93%) were men. The median age at neurological symptom onset was 45 years (range = 28-84). Median titer (ELISA) was 1:300 (1:50 to >1:6,400, normal value < 1:50). Coexistent kelchlike protein 11-IgG was identified in 18 cases (64%). The most common presenting phenotype was rhombencephalitis (17/28, 61%). Other presentations included limbic encephalitis (n = 5, 18%), seizures and/or encephalitis (n = 2, 7%), and motor neuronopathy/polyradiculopathy (n = 4, 14%). The most common malignancy among cancer-evaluated PNS patients was seminoma (21/27, 78%). Nine of the 21 seminomas detected by whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan (43%) were extratesticular. Both female patients had ovarian teratoma. Regressed testicular germ cell tumors were found in 4 patients. Exposure of T-cell-dendritic-cell cocultures from chronic immunosuppression-naïve LUZP4-IgG-seropositive patients to recombinant LUZP4 protein evoked a marked increase in CD69 expression on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells when compared to vehicle-exposed and healthy control cultures. INTERPRETATION: LUZP4-IgG represents a novel serological biomarker of PNS and has high predictive value for germ cell tumors. The demonstrated antigen-specific T-cell responses support a CD8+ T-cell-mediated cytotoxic paraneoplastic and antitumor potential. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:1001-1010.